New: Widespread RIFs/layoffs could come to the State Department as soon as Friday, though one source notes the department is expected to wait for a Supreme Court ruling on its reorganization plan (which is expected imminently) -https://t.co/Q4oDIFNvTQ
— Shelby Talcott (@ShelbyTalcott) June 25, 2025
The Skeptical Bureaucrat
From deep inside the foundations of our Republic's capital city
Friday, June 27, 2025
The Secretary Will Disavow Any Knowledge of Your RIF (Until Monday, Anyway)
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
New OBO Director Comes From 'Bill Clinton, Inc.' What??
James (Jim) has more than three decades of experience leading fiduciary and restructuring matters, as well as providing clients with key litigation support and expert witness testimony. As an advisor, Jim has worked primarily on debtor side assignments.What's up with that? Is Trump putting OBO in receivership? My good friends in OBO didn't do anything to earn that.
A newly revealed memo from a former aide to Bill Clinton details substantial overlap between donors to the nonprofit Clinton Foundation and the former president's personal financial activities, a $30 million-plus enterprise described in the memo as "Bill Clinton, Inc."
Money managers UBS and Barclays, mining giant BHP, and the for-profit educational company Laureate International Universities each made substantial payments to Bill Clinton for speeches or "advisory services," while also contributing to the Clinton Foundation.
Most of these payments were brokered by Doug Band, who served as a personal aide to Bill Clinton during his White House years, and later as a chief fundraiser for the Clinton Foundation.
- Snip -
[Teneo founder] Band's memo also documents the interlocking relationship between the Clinton Foundation's corporate contributors, Teneo clients and Bill Clinton's personal wealth.
- Snip -
Band estimated that he'd helped to secure work for the former president that yielded more than $30 million in personal profit between when Clinton left office in 2001 and when the memo was drafted in 2011, with another $66 million in the pipeline at the time.
That is a very strange background for a Trump Admin official. We'll see more from him soon, so we can hope for the best, but prepare for the worse.
Saturday, June 7, 2025
The Fortress Embassy That's Coming to Your Neighborhood
🚨#BREAKING: Protesters and rioters are now using hammers to break apart cement blocks near the Los Angeles detention center where ICE is holding over 40 undocumented immigrants. Tear gas and flash bangs are now being deployed by riot police video by @AnthonyCabassa_ pic.twitter.com/sYuJIraE9Y
— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) June 7, 2025
Back in the long-ago year of 1995 the U.S. government took a good look at the vulnerability of civilian federal office buildings to physical attack. (Read the report here.) In brief, the task force that researched and prepared the report recommended that the USG adopt a set of physical security standards that were closely modeled on the standards the State Department had created ten years earlier for overseas embassies.
Only, the overseas standards were thought to not be pertinent in all respects to the domestic threat environment, especially not to the threat of mob violence. After all, we'd had a large vehicle-borne bomb in the Oklahoma City attack, and that certainly looked exactly like overseas terrorism, but we hadn't had large mobs or other civil disturbances against domestic federal buildings in a very long time. [Pro Tip: look up the history of the 1919 General Steel Strike and the declaration of martial law in Gary, Indiana.]
So there was no need for our modern domestic building standards to require perimeter walls, forced-entry resistance, safe havens, or other such counter-mob defenses. That was just reasonable risk management.
Well, that reasoning was also from a very long time ago, and it no longer seems to apply to our new domestic threat environment. For instance, the ongoing riots against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.
Speaking of which, check out that video above of a protestor banging away with a hand tool at concrete anti-ram bollards - which are a countermeasure against vehicle threats - in front of an ICE detention center.
Why was he doing that, you may wonder? Maybe because he wanted to create a pile of concrete shards that his fellow protestors could fling at the detention center. Or, just as likely, for no good reason at all but simply because it was a riot and he wanted to do something mindless and destructive.
Whatever his reason, he kind of perfectly exemplifies the contemporary threat to domestic federal civilian buildings, and it is something that our current facility security standards do not begin to counter adequately.
My prediction: you may expect to see hasty walls and fences going up around your local government buildings in the short term, and proposals for costly forced-entry facade upgrades in the mid and long term.
Saturday, May 17, 2025
Will the FBI Really, at Long Last, Vacate Washington's Ministry of Fear HQ? Maybe.
Friday, May 9, 2025
Illegal Alien and Bunny Torturer Could Bring America Together
Can we all agree that this one needs to be deported? https://t.co/c7fWAdlDjD
— TSB (@TweetingTSB) May 9, 2025
Saturday, May 3, 2025
Did the U.S. Institute of Peace Have a Secret Escape Route?
Conspiracy theorists have stumbled upon a good one here. https://t.co/0DDmGMHF6M
— TSB (@TweetingTSB) May 3, 2025
Who owns that property at the other end of USIP's odd enclosed walkway, and what did that property used to be used for?
It's a strange Washington DC tale that connects not just two buildings but the founder of modern oceanography, the location of scientific timekeeping, World War II history, and the Cold War.
I'm waiting anxiously to see what the conspiracy freaks will make of it all.
Tuesday, April 29, 2025
They're Leaving On a Jet Plane, In Increasing Numbers
https://t.co/c9v1f384l4
— FOX21 News (@FOX21News) April 27, 2025
Video courtesy: @DEAROCKYMTNDiv pic.twitter.com/NcCtwk8V9m