Friday, June 27, 2025

The Secretary Will Disavow Any Knowledge of Your RIF (Until Monday, Anyway)



As you've surely seen by now, today's Supreme Court decision in a pertinent case has paused, at least for a little while, the RIFs that were heavily rumored to take place today. Will they take place next week instead? Maybe.

The OPSEC fans among us, looking for observables and indicators, noticed that most of the large conference rooms at HST and Rosslyn annexes - where processing of RIF'ed employees would be likely to take place - were reserved today.  

I, personally, was headed to an early morning meeting today in a large conference room in SA-6 when I noticed that the meeting venue had been changed to another building at the last minute. It made me feel a chill as if the Angel of Death were circling over my good friends in OBO.

Don't give in to despair. Wait and see, and be assured that the worst is usually not as bad as you'd imagined it would be.

 

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

New OBO Director Comes From 'Bill Clinton, Inc.' What??

The new Director of Overseas Buildings Operations has been announced, and I freely admit that he leaves me perplexed. 

First, he's not a construction guy. No construction experience at all, but lots of bankruptcy and restructuring work. That's quite odd, especially given that a Trump Administration must be full of construction people, or so you’d think. 

But worse is that he comes from a senior position at Teneo, which is the money-grubbing arm of the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton’s personal financial benefactor. 

Teneo's website still identifies James Feltman this way:
James (Jim) has more than three decades of experience leading fiduciary and restructuring matters, as well as providing clients with key litigation support and expert witness testimony. As an advisor, Jim has worked primarily on debtor side assignments.
What's up with that? Is Trump putting OBO in receivership? My good friends in OBO didn't do anything to earn that. 

About Teneo, here's a typical news story about its cozy arrangement with the Clintons. Notice that the story comes from NPR and uses Wikileaks stolen email as its sourcing, so it has an impeccable left-side political pedigree despite the content. (So, that means if you dislike the info or the tone, I’ll assume you’re wearing a MAGA hat!)
A newly revealed memo from a former aide to Bill Clinton details substantial overlap between donors to the nonprofit Clinton Foundation and the former president's personal financial activities, a $30 million-plus enterprise described in the memo as "Bill Clinton, Inc."  
Money managers UBS and Barclays, mining giant BHP, and the for-profit educational company Laureate International Universities each made substantial payments to Bill Clinton for speeches or "advisory services," while also contributing to the Clinton Foundation. 
Most of these payments were brokered by Doug Band, who served as a personal aide to Bill Clinton during his White House years, and later as a chief fundraiser for the Clinton Foundation.  
- Snip - 
[Teneo founder] Band's memo also documents the interlocking relationship between the Clinton Foundation's corporate contributors, Teneo clients and Bill Clinton's personal wealth. 
- Snip - 
Band estimated that he'd helped to secure work for the former president that yielded more than $30 million in personal profit between when Clinton left office in 2001 and when the memo was drafted in 2011, with another $66 million in the pipeline at the time.

That is a very strange background for a Trump Admin official. We'll see more from him soon, so we can hope for the best, but prepare for the worse.


Saturday, June 7, 2025

The Fortress Embassy That's Coming to Your Neighborhood


Back in the long-ago year of 1995 the U.S. government took a good look at the vulnerability of civilian federal office buildings to physical attack. (Read the report here.) In brief, the task force that researched and prepared the report recommended that the USG adopt a set of physical security standards that were closely modeled on the standards the State Department had created ten years earlier for overseas embassies.

Only, the overseas standards were thought to not be pertinent in all respects to the domestic threat environment, especially not to the threat of mob violence. After all, we'd had a large vehicle-borne bomb in the Oklahoma City attack, and that certainly looked exactly like overseas terrorism, but we hadn't had large mobs or other civil disturbances against domestic federal buildings in a very long time. [Pro Tip: look up the history of the 1919 General Steel Strike and the declaration of martial law in Gary, Indiana.] 

So there was no need for our modern domestic building standards to require perimeter walls, forced-entry resistance, safe havens, or other such counter-mob defenses. That was just reasonable risk management.

Well, that reasoning was also from a very long time ago, and it no longer seems to apply to our new domestic threat environment. For instance, the ongoing riots against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.

Speaking of which, check out that video above of a protestor banging away with a hand tool at concrete anti-ram bollards - which are a countermeasure against vehicle threats - in front of an ICE detention center. 

Why was he doing that, you may wonder? Maybe because he wanted to create a pile of concrete shards that his fellow protestors could fling at the detention center. Or, just as likely, for no good reason at all but simply because it was a riot and he wanted to do something mindless and destructive. 

Whatever his reason, he kind of perfectly exemplifies the contemporary threat to domestic federal civilian buildings, and it is something that our current facility security standards do not begin to counter adequately. 

My prediction: you may expect to see hasty walls and fences going up around your local government buildings in the short term, and proposals for costly forced-entry facade upgrades in the mid and long term.