New OBO Director Comes From 'Bill Clinton, Inc.' What??

The new Director of Overseas Buildings Operations has been announced, and I freely admit that he leaves me perplexed. 

First, he's not a construction guy. No construction experience at all, but lots of bankruptcy and restructuring work. That's quite odd, especially given that a Trump Administration must be full of construction people, or so you’d think. 

But worse is that he comes from a senior position at Teneo, which is the money-grubbing arm of the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton’s personal financial benefactor. 

Teneo's website still identifies James Feltman this way:

James (Jim) has more than three decades of experience leading fiduciary and restructuring matters, as well as providing clients with key litigation support and expert witness testimony. As an advisor, Jim has worked primarily on debtor side assignments.

What's up with that? Is Trump putting OBO in receivership? My good friends in OBO didn't do anything to earn that. 

About Teneo, here's a typical news story about its cozy arrangement with the Clintons. Notice that the story comes from NPR and uses Wikileaks stolen email as its sourcing, so it has an impeccable left-side political pedigree despite the content. (So, that means if you dislike the info or the tone, I’ll assume you’re wearing a MAGA hat!)

A newly revealed memo from a former aide to Bill Clinton details substantial overlap between donors to the nonprofit Clinton Foundation and the former president's personal financial activities, a $30 million-plus enterprise described in the memo as "Bill Clinton, Inc."  

Money managers UBS and Barclays, mining giant BHP, and the for-profit educational company Laureate International Universities each made substantial payments to Bill Clinton for speeches or "advisory services," while also contributing to the Clinton Foundation. 

Most of these payments were brokered by Doug Band, who served as a personal aide to Bill Clinton during his White House years, and later as a chief fundraiser for the Clinton Foundation.  

- Snip - 

[Teneo founder] Band's memo also documents the interlocking relationship between the Clinton Foundation's corporate contributors, Teneo clients and Bill Clinton's personal wealth. 

- Snip - 

Band estimated that he'd helped to secure work for the former president that yielded more than $30 million in personal profit between when Clinton left office in 2001 and when the memo was drafted in 2011, with another $66 million in the pipeline at the time.

That is a very strange background for a Trump Admin official. We'll see more from him soon, so we can hope for the best, but prepare for the worse.

The Fortress Embassy That's Coming to Your Neighborhood

🚨#BREAKING: Protesters and rioters are now using hammers to break apart cement blocks near the Los Angeles detention center where ICE is holding over 40 undocumented immigrants. Tear gas and flash bangs are now being deployed by riot police video by @AnthonyCabassa_ pic.twitter.com/sYuJIraE9Y

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) June 7, 2025

Back in the long-ago year of 1995 the U.S. government took a good look at the vulnerability of civilian federal office buildings to physical attack. (Read the report here.) In brief, the task force that researched and prepared the report recommended that the USG adopt a set of physical security standards that were closely modeled on the standards the State Department had created ten years earlier for overseas embassies.

Only, the overseas standards were thought to not be pertinent in all respects to the domestic threat environment, especially not to the threat of mob violence. After all, we'd had a large vehicle-borne bomb in the Oklahoma City attack, and that certainly looked exactly like overseas terrorism, but we hadn't had large mobs or other civil disturbances against domestic federal buildings in a very long time. [Pro Tip: look up the history of the 1919 General Steel Strike and the declaration of martial law in Gary, Indiana.] 

So there was no need for our modern domestic building standards to require perimeter walls, forced-entry resistance, safe havens, or other such counter-mob defenses. That was just reasonable risk management.

Well, that reasoning was also from a very long time ago, and it no longer seems to apply to our new domestic threat environment. For instance, the ongoing riots against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.

Speaking of which, check out that video above of a protestor banging away with a hand tool at concrete anti-ram bollards - which are a countermeasure against vehicle threats - in front of an ICE detention center. 

Why was he doing that, you may wonder? Maybe because he wanted to create a pile of concrete shards that his fellow protestors could fling at the detention center. Or, just as likely, for no good reason at all but simply because it was a riot and he wanted to do something mindless and destructive. 

Whatever his reason, he kind of perfectly exemplifies the contemporary threat to domestic federal civilian buildings, and it is something that our current facility security standards do not begin to counter adequately. 

My prediction: you may expect to see hasty walls and fences going up around your local government buildings in the short term, and proposals for costly forced-entry facade upgrades in the mid and long term. 

Will the FBI Really, at Long Last, Vacate Washington's Ministry of Fear HQ? Maybe.

 

First of all, hey! New York Post, please look up the definition of "commiserate" because I'm pretty sure the new FBI Director actually said "commensurate," which is the word that makes sense in that context. 

OTOH, anyone with a heart can commiserate with those who have to work in or even drive past that edifice of architectural overreach that is the J. Edgar Hoover Building. It was the most expensive government office building ever built in DC - yes, even more costly than the Pentagon - when it was completed in the 1970s - but it's already completely shot, dysfunctional, and not by any stretch physically secure.

It has only one thing going for it, and that is location. It's next to the beautiful Art Deco Justice Department building, which is exactly where a BUREAU of the Justice Department should be if it is to be fully functional. And location is the overwhelmingly important factor in any real estate deal. 

For the FBI is, literally, the Bureau of Investigation of the Justice Department, one of a number of bureaus that report to the Attorney General, and not / not a separate government agency no matter how much it pretends to be the later.

Something else the FBI is not is a national police force. The federal government has very little to do with policing violent crime or indeed most other types of crime. Those remain a local and state responsibility. When Kash Patel says he plans to spread most of the FBI staff out around the country to fight crime, he is walking down the empire-building path of J. Edgar Hoover, which ought to be alarming in this MAGA administration. 

I would have expected The Trumpening to put the FBI back into its administrative box in DOJ, not to achieve Hoover's old gangbusters dream. (By the way, has it ever occurred to you that there is nothing more absurd than an accountant with an assault weapon? It does to me whenever I see FBI agents in Studly Wear and Theatrics - SWaT - costume.)

There is one clear and rational path forward if the Administration and Congress are finally serious about replacing the Hoover Building, and that is to demolish the building and replace it with a smaller one on the same site. That would require no new site selection and purchase, would preserve some vital infrastructure that's on the current site, and would make modern facility security requirements achievable. 

The only downsides are the need to move FBI offices into swing space for a few years, and that the avoidance of an enormous 3+ billion dollar new construction project elsewhere would make some greedy Virginia and Maryland politicians cry. 

Actually, that last one is a plus, not a negative. And so is the first one if the swing space were to be obtained in the former Trump Hotel directly across the street from Hoover's HQ. That hotel is still a GSA property, so far as I know, and it held FBI overflow offices before the Hoover Building was constructed. The FBI would be returning to its roots there.   

     

Illegal Alien and Bunny Torturer Could Bring America Together

 

 

I'm not a fan of punk music generally, but I do like this cover version of our new deportation theme song. it starts pretty easy but then turns hard. Please enjoy!

Now, for the point of this post. Have a look at today's article in the Daily Mail and ask yourself whether you can think of anyone, anyone at all, who would not be happy to see her sent home. Or sent anywhere - Rwanda, El Salvador, Gitmo, wherever - just so long as she doesn't come back here.

 

Can we all agree that this one needs to be deported? https://t.co/c7fWAdlDjD

— TSB (@TweetingTSB) May 9, 2025

 

Did the U.S. Institute of Peace Have a Secret Escape Route?

Conspiracy theorists have stumbled upon a good one here. https://t.co/0DDmGMHF6M

— TSB (@TweetingTSB) May 3, 2025

Who owns that property at the other end of USIP's odd enclosed walkway, and what did that property used to be used for? 

It's a strange Washington DC tale that connects not just two buildings but the founder of modern oceanography, the location of scientific timekeeping, World War II history, and the Cold War. 

I'm waiting anxiously to see what the conspiracy freaks will make of it all. 

They're Leaving On a Jet Plane, In Increasing Numbers

https://t.co/c9v1f384l4
Video courtesy: @DEAROCKYMTNDiv pic.twitter.com/NcCtwk8V9m

— FOX21 News (@FOX21News) April 27, 2025

And introducing our new theme song for posts about deportation! 

I think it achieves a jarring dissonance between the nitty gritty of immigration law enforcement and our normal sentimentality about humanitarian treatment.

 

With yesterday's executive order empowering local police to assist federal agencies with the very large backlog of existing deportation orders - well over one million of them! - we'll see a great many more roundups like the one yesterday in Colorado Springs.

The Real Reorg - Which Posts Should Be Closed?

“Neither does [reorganization] involve rhetoric that accuses our diplomats of being ineffective, lacking accountability and concern for American interests.” The problem is, of course, that the voters are not of one mind about what those interests are. https://t.co/jpXJtL4UZj

— TSB (@TweetingTSB) April 24, 2025

Now that all the journalists, commentators, public policy analysts and barristas - those last two categories overlap - have gotten tired of chasing their tails around and around over last week's preposterous phony reorg plan leak, finally we have the real thing released by the SecState himself. 

Bottom Line Up Front, as we're told to say in memos, State is looking at a 15 percent reduction in force and the closure of a not-yet-defined number of overseas missions. 

The first round of voluntary deferred resignations reduced the ranks a bit already, and a second round was initiated last Friday by a late afternoon email from the new M-DR. In addition to that, I know that some PSC contractors were let go, as were probationary employees. 

How many more reductions will be needed to hit the 15 percent goal? Beats me, but I've seen estimates as low as 700 and as high as 2,500. 

Now, what about the closure of some embassies and consulates? Which ones will go? Lists have floated around for weeks but to the best of my knowledge nothing official has been released. 

Moreover, and much more interesting to me, how will that decision to close a post be made? Instead of publishing a list, whoever is in charge should instead identify rational criteria for making that choice. Such an approach would be fair and be seen as fair, and could be defended before Congress and our various special interests. It might even make sense to the public.  

For instance, how many reporting cables did a post send last year? How many visas issued? How many ACS cases handled? How many desk positions does it support? At some tiny posts all of those figures are in the single digits. 

Objectively and empirically, some overseas posts are not worth the considerable costs to keep them open. And their regional bureaus back in DC know that better than anyone. 

None of this is new, of course. Back in the Clinton administration days the Department reevaluated its overseas presence and identified 20 or 25 posts that could be closed, according to the official history of those years. 

That happened back when VP Al Gore was nosily 'reinventing government' as his ticket to succeeding Clinton in 2020. The reinvention worked out about as well as Gore's political future did. OTOH, they reduced the size of government by about 400,000 positions, or around twenty percent.

I say, always take the long view. We've been here before, and we'll be here again. Government never really gets reinvented. If you want to have a career that lasts a considerable time you've got to roll with the punches.