Saturday, May 17, 2025

Will the FBI Really, at Long Last, Vacate Washington's Ministry of Fear HQ? Maybe.

 

First of all, hey! New York Post, please look up the definition of "commiserate" because I'm pretty sure the new FBI Director actually said "commensurate," which is the word that makes sense in that context. 

OTOH, anyone with a heart can commiserate with those who have to work in or even drive past that edifice of architectural overreach that is the J. Edgar Hoover Building. It was the most expensive government office building ever built in DC - yes, even more costly than the Pentagon - when it was completed in the 1970s - but it's already completely shot, dysfunctional, and not by any stretch physically secure.

It has only one thing going for it, and that is location. It's next to the beautiful Art Deco Justice Department building, which is exactly where a BUREAU of the Justice Department should be if it is to be fully functional. And location is the overwhelmingly important factor in any real estate deal. 

For the FBI is, literally, the Bureau of Investigation of the Justice Department, one of a number of bureaus that report to the Attorney General, and not / not a separate government agency no matter how much it pretends to be the later.

Something else the FBI is not is a national police force. The federal government has very little to do with policing violent crime or indeed most other types of crime. Those remain a local and state responsibility. When Kash Patel says he plans to spread most of the FBI staff out around the country to fight crime, he is walking down the empire-building path of J. Edgar Hoover, which ought to be alarming in this MAGA administration. 

I would have expected The Trumpening to put the FBI back into its administrative box in DOJ, not to achieve Hoover's old gangbusters dream. (By the way, has it ever occurred to you that there is nothing more absurd than an accountant with an assault weapon? It does to me whenever I see FBI agents in Studly Wear and Theatrics - SWaT - costume.)

There is one clear and rational path forward if the Administration and Congress are finally serious about replacing the Hoover Building, and that is to demolish the building and replace it with a smaller one on the same site. That would require no new site selection and purchase, would preserve some vital infrastructure that's on the current site, and would make modern facility security requirements achievable. 

The only downsides are the need to move FBI offices into swing space for a few years, and that the avoidance of an enormous 3+ billion dollar new construction project elsewhere would make some greedy Virginia and Maryland politicians cry. 

Actually, that last one is a plus, not a negative. And so is the first one if the swing space were to be obtained in the former Trump Hotel directly across the street from Hoover's HQ. That hotel is still a GSA property, so far as I know, and it held FBI overflow offices before the Hoover Building was constructed. The FBI would be returning to its roots there.   

     

Friday, May 9, 2025

Illegal Alien and Bunny Torturer Could Bring America Together

 
 
I'm not a fan of punk music generally, but I do like this cover version of our new deportation theme song. it starts pretty easy but then turns hard. Please enjoy!

Now, for the point of this post. Have a look at today's article in the Daily Mail and ask yourself whether you can think of anyone, anyone at all, who would not be happy to see her sent home. Or sent anywhere - Rwanda, El Salvador, Gitmo, wherever - just so long as she doesn't come back here.

 

 

Saturday, May 3, 2025

Did the U.S. Institute of Peace Have a Secret Escape Route?


Who owns that property at the other end of USIP's odd enclosed walkway, and what did that property used to be used for? 

It's a strange Washington DC tale that connects not just two buildings but the founder of modern oceanography, the location of scientific timekeeping, World War II history, and the Cold War. 

I'm waiting anxiously to see what the conspiracy freaks will make of it all. 



Tuesday, April 29, 2025

They're Leaving On a Jet Plane, In Increasing Numbers


And introducing our new theme song for posts about deportation! 

I think it achieves a jarring dissonance between the nitty gritty of immigration law enforcement and our normal sentimentality about humanitarian treatment.

 

With yesterday's executive order empowering local police to assist federal agencies with the very large backlog of existing deportation orders - well over one million of them! - we'll see a great many more roundups like the one yesterday in Colorado Springs.

Saturday, April 26, 2025

The Real Reorg - Which Posts Should Be Closed?


Now that all the journalists, commentators, public policy analysts and barristas - those last two categories overlap - have gotten tired of chasing their tails around and around over last week's preposterous phony reorg plan leak, finally we have the real thing released by the SecState himself. 

Bottom Line Up Front, as we're told to say in memos, State is looking at a 15 percent reduction in force and the closure of a not-yet-defined number of overseas missions. 

The first round of voluntary deferred resignations reduced the ranks a bit already, and a second round was initiated last Friday by a late afternoon email from the new M-DR. In addition to that, I know that some PSC contractors were let go, as were probationary employees. 

How many more reductions will be needed to hit the 15 percent goal? Beats me, but I've seen estimates as low as 700 and as high as 2,500. 

Now, what about the closure of some embassies and consulates? Which ones will go? Lists have floated around for weeks but to the best of my knowledge nothing official has been released. 

Moreover, and much more interesting to me, how will that decision to close a post be made? Instead of publishing a list, whoever is in charge should instead identify rational criteria for making that choice. Such an approach would be fair and be seen as fair, and could be defended before Congress and our various special interests. It might even make sense to the public.  

For instance, how many reporting cables did a post send last year? How many visas issued? How many ACS cases handled? How many desk positions does it support? At some tiny posts all of those figures are in the single digits. 

Objectively and empirically, some overseas posts are not worth the considerable costs to keep them open. And their regional bureaus back in DC know that better than anyone. 

None of this is new, of course. Back in the Clinton administration days the Department reevaluated its overseas presence and identified 20 or 25 posts that could be closed, according to the official history of those years

That happened back when VP Al Gore was nosily 'reinventing government' as his ticket to succeeding Clinton in 2020. The reinvention worked out about as well as Gore's political future did. OTOH, they reduced the size of government by about 400,000 positions, or around twenty percent.

I say, always take the long view. We've been here before, and we'll be here again. Government never really gets reinvented. If you want to have a career that lasts a considerable time you've got to roll with the punches. 
  
 

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

The Real Reorg Chart is Released


Among the glaring mistakes made by the hoaxster who passed off yesterday's faux leak to a credulous news media, my favorite was the merger of OBO with OFM. Overseas Buildings Operations might sound a lot like the Office of Foreign Missions, but confusing them is a dead give-away that someone didn't bother to so much as search those terms. 

On the other hand, most or all of the news media wasn't any more diligent before they passed those phony leaks on. 

Happily, the real reorg draft plan as released today is considerably more reassuring than the half-informed speculation we saw over the weekend.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Out: Embassy in a Box. In: FLEX


Closing diplomatic posts and changing our overseas presence must be a complicated process, so you'd expect there to be a manual or instructions of some kind. Well, you'd be right, and it's right here in a publicly available document. Feel free to really explore the bureaucratic minutia. 

Assuming you've read that Punchbowl article, let's discuss a few things. 

First, is "FLEX" an acronym, and if so what does it stand for? The answer is yes, and it stands for Fast, Lean, Efficient, and Expedient. In practice that sounds like diplomatic missions of limited scope and scaled-down facilities. Like what a tiny house is to a regular house. 

Another term that probably made you curious is the concept of closed missions being “folded into” nearby embassies. Very odd. My guess is that means some functions and personnel would simply be moved to those nearby missions, and maybe ambassadors would be regionally-accredited to more than one country.  

And what about that plan for our Tri-Mission posts (Rome, Paris, Brussels, Vienna, etc.)? They're in for a shock if the international missions are moved into our bilateral embassies. Can three ambassadors share a single building??? Who gets first dibs on the pool or tennis court??? Endless petty annoyances would ensue. 

Nothing will bring out in-fighting better than a struggle over an up-to 50 percent budget cut. Coming soon.